“For the policy to succeed, the support of principals is critical,” president of the NZPF Philip Harding says.
“We have surveyed school principals and it is clear that they do not have confidence that the IES, as a model, can achieve a strong collaborative culture for schools, nor lift the achievement of especially our priority learners.”
The survey showed overwhelming opposition and concern from a sample of over 1000 principals. They said the model was too complex and inflexible in its present form to deliver on its goals, and principals would rather see this money moved closer to classrooms and children, than have it spent on topping up salaries for a few.
“The policy represents a huge investment in a critical area. It is vital that Government doesn’t steamroll another flawed model over the top of a profession holding significant and legitimate concerns.
“Under this model, $90m per year, which represents 90 per cent of this resource, will go to just six per cent of teachers and principals. One third of that money will disappear through taxation. This money would be so much better targeted to enabling collaborative processes releasing and involving all principals, and supporting priority learners,” Mr Harding says.
“Our opposition is not due to the policy’s intent which we support. Principals are quite clear that it is the proposed design that is the problem and it will not land well in the diverse contexts in which schools sit.”
It's been a big year in the education sector, and we're all looking forward to…
ERO is publishing a series of best practice guides to help educators effectively implement incoming…
Summer reading can help students retain literacy skills over the break – how can we…
Pakuranga Intermediate demonstrates the simple power of a friendly, welcoming environment
The new Māori Education Action Plan has been criticised by some as being light on…
How can we use AI to transform education while being mindful of its limitations, pitfalls…
This website uses cookies.