Categories: NewsAdministration

Schools reminded not to pass digital tech costs on to parents

Schools are urged to be mindful that they cannot by law charge for delivering the curriculum, including requiring students to bring in electronic devices.

With digital technology now officially on the New Zealand Curriculum, it has become the norm for schools to encourage families to buy computers for their children to use as part of a BYOD policy. Many schools include the device on the list of required stationery. But, says the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), schools cannot by law charge for delivering the official curriculum, and already overstretched families face the dilemma of either taking on significantly more debt to fund the purchase or seeing their children disadvantaged at school. 

basic device may cost several hundred dollars, while a higher quality one can cost well over $1,000. On top of this, parents may need to buy accessories and additional insurance.

“Time payments for such purchases may end up costing more in the long run through high interest rates. Many families turn to short-term loan providers to ensure their children are as adequately equipped as their peers, resulting in ongoing, increased weekly costs,” says CPAG’s education spokesperson Professor John O’Neill,

“The Ministry of Education (MoE) and Education Review Office (ERO) have a role to play. MoE needs to advise Government on the funding levels that schools require to meet all the costs of curriculum delivery, including digital technology. ERO needs to ensure schools follow the law in terms of charging fees and requesting donations, and in being reasonable in their expectations of how much overstretched families will contribute to meeting the cost of a 21st century learning experience for children.

“Introducing digital technology into the curriculum is a good thing. Expecting schools to include these in a stationery pack and pushing families further into a spiral of debt is not.”

School News

School News is not affiliated with any government agency, body or political party. We are an independently owned, family-operated magazine.

Recent Posts

Ending streaming: the first annual report

Kōkirihia Annual Report 2024 details the first year of destreaming across Aotearoa to achieve more…

6 days ago

Research, evidence and education policy

The ‘science of learning’ and ‘evidence-based approaches’ have become buzz-phrases – what do they mean,…

6 days ago

Guiding a blind runner at the Paralympics – Why teaching is the same

There are many similarities between being a teacher and a sighted guide for a Paralympian.

6 days ago

Opinion: The government needs to slow down on sweeping changes to NZ’s maths curriculum

New Zealand academics David Pomeroy and Lisa Darragh argue reforming our maths education requires a…

6 days ago

Leaving the classroom to boost wellbeing

Taking students out of the classroom for educational activities may benefit more than their learning…

6 days ago

Banning social media for under-16s won’t help – teaching digital media literacy will

Digital media literacy could be the answer to concerns about the mental health effects of…

2 weeks ago