Given cost savings, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says the food is unlikely to be "the best food" ever. Photo by Mario Gogh on Unsplash.
Recently Deputy Education Minister David Seymour announced that funding for the programme may be cut by as much as 50 percent, claiming that the programme is wasteful and does not provide value for money.
Read the latest print edition of School News HERE
The letter calls on the government to continue funding for the programme at current levels, stating that the programme has created massive benefit in communities.
It reads in part: “One in five children in our country live with food poverty. Nutritious food is essential for learning, which is why the school lunch programme was created.”
The letter also draws attention to the recent PISA research that says children who miss meals are two – four years behind children who never miss meals in school.
“Of concern is that the most recent PISA results found 14 percent of New Zealand students did not eat at least once a week because of lack of money, compared to 8 percent of students on average across the OECD.”
A dozen leaders in the education sector have signed onto the open letter, including unions and teaching associations. They include Mark Potter from NZEI Te Riu Roa, Vaughan Couillault from the Secondary Principals’ Association of NZ, Chris Abercrombie of the PPTA and Bruce Jepsen from Te Akatea.
Teachers must work for almost a decade before they accrue more income than a minimum…
The NZATE has withdrawn from the English curriculum rewrite citing transparency, timing and content concerns.
A new paper has found generative AI can potentially cause overreliance on the tool and…
Charter schools are opening their doors - but are they really better for learning? The…
Real stories of dedication, challenges, and triumphs from educators in NZ. Part four comes from…
Administration costs of the school lunch programme are being passed onto schools, say Principals.
This website uses cookies.
